Showing the grim, violent reality of combat was one approach. The idea of “no good war”, especially in the Cold War era of moral fogginess, began to extend beyond any specific conflict to the very idea of war, and the plight of the often young, often unenthusiastic men upon whom fell the responsibility of fighting and dying i.e. 12 O’Clock High (1949), Battleground (1949), Attack! (1956), The Bridge on the River Kwai (1957) a portrait which grew even darker and more morally ambivalent with the Korean War and the likes of The Bridges at Toko Ri (1954), Men in War (1957), and Pork Chop Hill (1959). Oh, there were still a lot of very patriotic, very thrilling back-patting war movies like The Flying Leathernecks (1951) and The Sands of Iwo Jima (1949), and exhilarating actioners like The Guns of Navarone (1961), but just as often postwar screens were treated to a more grimly realistic picture of what Eisenhower had dubbed “The Great Crusade,” i.e. “Maybe there’s only one revolution, and that’s in the beginning when it’s the good guys against the bad guys.
There’s a line in Richard Brooks’ The Professionals (1966) where a disillusioned Mexican Revolution soldier turned mercenary catches some of the feelings of the time: In that light, a certain amount of disillusionment with the simplistic idea of the Good Guys valiantly triumphing over the Bad Guys was inevitable, and it wasn’t helped by the moral ambiguity clouding so many post-1945 conflicts. There was the Cold War, nuclear threats, proxy wars, Korea, the Cuban Missile Crisis, and the often violent dissolution of colonial empires. The end of the greatest conflict in history may have solved the problems of terrifying Axis global domination but brought little in the way of peace. But years before Terkel had found the right language for the thought, and even before the country’s embroilment in open conflict in Vietnam escalated to the point of national tragedy, there had been a major re-think going on in post-WW II popular culture about how we thought of and pictured a clash of arms. I think it’s just a twisted horror game, but see for yourself and listen to some of the music you’ll be getting with the pre-order bonus.With his 1984 oral history of World War II, The Good War, Studs Terkel articulated the sad fact that there were no good wars, even a conflict most clearly justified and necessary as our engagement in WW II. The game director Shuji Ishikawa explains it best: “It’s children being children without the filter of guilt or sin.” The Japanese release of the game was met with some criticism because the young girls in the game are depicted a little risqué. You must escape from the mansion before getting killed.īefore watching the trailer, please be aware you need to be at least 18 years old. The boy handed her a picture book “Little Princess” and ran away, she follows him to a mansion, and is then captured by a bunch of arrogant, mean young girls called the Aristrocracy of the Red Crayon, who threaten Jennifer’s life. She encountered a mysterious boy, who only she can see. The story takes place in the England in 1930, the protagonist Jennifer is a 19 year old girl, who missed her last bus at night in the park. Developed in Japan by Punchline and Shirogumi, and published in Japan by Sony Computer Entertainment Inc., Rule of Rose is scheduled for release in September 12, 2006.
0 kommentar(er)
